Isn't Housing Child Welfare?

Written by -

Isn’t Housing Child Welfare?

Yesterday, I finally got an appellate opinion in a case in which I represented the child’s mother.  The Court of Appeals unanimously reversed the trial court’s finding of dependency, determining my client had been penalized for simply asking the Department of Family and Children Services (“DFCS”) for help to find housing for herself and her child. In the first paragraph of a blistering concurring opinion, Judge Dillard wrote,

As President Ronald Reagan once quipped, “ ‘[t]he nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help’” V.G.’s mother learned this the hard way when she sought government assistance in securing suitable housing for her and her young son. Big mistake.

The opinion highlights the ways in which the State utterly fails the most needy families. DFCS removed V.G. because his family was homeless and no one could help the family obtain housing. That’s it. This choice cannot be the only one we have.  Sending children to foster care because their parents cannot find a house not only undermines families but, as the Court of Appeals reminded us in V.G., also runs afoul of the law.

Access to safe and stable housing remains one of the biggest challenges in child welfare. DFCS would not have removed V.G. “but for” his mother’s lack of shelter. But lack of housing should never be the reason child welfare agencies remove children from their parents. First, we know the significant trauma caused by the removal of the child for both the child and the parents. Second, child removal due to a lack of housing only forces state agencies to divert resources away from the actual cases that require state intervention. Finally, these cases are often the most challenging to “resolve” given the lack of housing options. Low-income parents face multiple barriers to housing ranging from poor credit, unhealthy housing conditions, and lack of affordable units. The foster care system is not designed to remedy these barriers.  How often do child protection agencies and courts actually resolve a housing issue?

The significance of safe, affordable housing has led some leading health service providers to work on increasing housing opportunities for marginalized populations. A recent article in the Nonprofit Quarterly[1], reported that six New Jersey hospitals have partnered to improve health outcomes for vulnerable patients by providing financial incentives to expand their access to affordable housing. The American Hospital Association reports that 

housing instability, whether as a result of homelessness, poor living conditions, or substandard housing structures is directly related to health. According to research, individuals and families affected by these challenges generally have less access to preventive care and are more susceptible to chronic conditions like diabetes and cardiovascular or pulmonary disease. These patients end up in the emergency room for their medical care.

These health providers determined that housing instability constrained patients’ ability to access meaningful preventive healthcare.   So the patient’s lack of housing had to be addressed if better health was to be achieved.  Importantly they decided that emergency rooms, like foster care, should not be the point of care for help.  We must do the same in child welfare.

The idea of preventive care is what many in the field highlight as the future of child welfare as we usher in the Family First Prevention Services Act (italics added).  However, the prevention services identified in the Act focus on addressing family safety through improved relationships and supports but do little to address the key family need for stable housing. Many of our families can benefit from at least some of the services spelled out in FFPSA, but without affordable housing, these services will have only limited preventive impact.

So, as we usher in this new child welfare era and deliberate about these new mandates, I challenge all of us to consider how to capitalize on this potential paradigm shift and create new housing opportunities for our families who need them. After all, Charles Richman, the head of the New Jersey Housing and Mortgage Finance Agency, justified creating housing incentives for hospitals because “housing is healthcare.”

Isn’t it also true that “housing is child welfare”?

 

 

 



[1]  “Six New Jersey Hospitals Receive Incentives to Create More Affordable Housing” by Meredith Betz.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It's Time To Follow The Law And Take Reasonable Efforts Seriously

Written by -
It’s Time to Follow the Law and Take Reasonable Efforts Seriously David Kelly Special Assistant to the Associate Commissioner of the Children’s Bureau A caseworker driving a child four hours--one way-- to visit his mother on a weekly basis.   The child welfare agency putting a family up in a hotel for two days and hiring a professional cleaning service to return a home to a habitable condition.   A children’s attorney refusing to give up on finding a family connection for a severely disabled young man, even though he requires a residential treatment setting.   A judge understanding the treatment and recovery process and insisting a parent receive the support they need.   These are all solid examples of reasonable efforts to prevent removal or finalize a permanency plan recently provided by an audience of child welfare legal professionals.   In total, a dozen or so strong responses to the straightforward question, what are the best examples of reasonable efforts that you hav
Read more

A Song for Families

Written by -
A Song for Families   An episode of NPR’s all-songs-considered has been stuck in my head for the past week or so.   I listened to it on the drive back to DC from the holiday weekend.   The theme was anthems.   It was fascinating.   The hosts discussed the contexts in which the songs were written, how each came to be known, what they represented and why they warranted anthem status.   They explored how anthems can celebrate, commemorate, or question if America is living up to its ideals-- and how each type was inherently patriotic.   The Star Spangled Banner headlined, but the hosts soon turned to “This land is our land,”   “Blowing in the Wind”, “Born in the USA”, “Fight the Power” (both versions) and a couple others.   They unpacked the songs.   Some were controversial.   Some were misunderstood.   All are emblematic. Guthrie sang to the dangers of economic disparity. Springsteen called us to do better by veterans. Dylan questioned the prudence of war.   Public Ene
Read more

Redesigning The Delivery Of Legal Services To Prevent Children From Entering Foster Care

Written by -
Imagine, for a moment, that we redesigned the delivery of legal services to prevent children from unnecessarily entering foster care.   What would that look like?   How would we allocate resources?   Would it be effective?   Four fundamental principles inform my thinking about these questions.   First , struggling families need access to legal advocacy well before a problem turns into a crisis.   Consider a family about to become homeless due to a wrongful eviction.   Or a single mother improperly being denied public benefits.   Think about a kid acting out in school and at home because administrators are unwilling to offer him the special education services he is legally entitled to.   Lawyers can play an integral role in solving these problems.   And each of these problems, if unresolved, could add significant stressors to a family that could destabilize a family unit.   Second , families in crisis – that is those involved with Child Protective Services (“CPS”)
Read more