While We Celebrate, Some Children Grieve
Sitting across the coffee table from
me, a young woman – adopted as a child out of foster care – shared her
experiences. She had achieved incredible success in life, a college degree,
with a master’s degree forthcoming. Yet the overriding emotions she described were
feelings of loss and confusion after being adopted.
Unanswered questions had lingered
in her mind for years, causing pain. Why did the court terminate the rights of
her birth mother and prevent her from ever seeing her mother again? Why wasn’t she allowed to give input into the
decision to terminate her mother’s rights?
Why was she placed with a white family – even though she was black? Could more have been done to prevent her from
being separated from her family?
The uncertainties poured out of her
mind. As we talked, she made clear that she was not alone – so many kids
adopted out of foster care shared her doubts. Many addressed their pain by connecting
with their birth families through social media. Or self-medicating.
Every year, thousands of children
exit the foster care through adoptions. Balloons are launched. Cakes are eaten.
Applauses are heard. Smiles are displayed. We publicly celebrate success during
annual Adoption Days.
In our minds, we have achieved a
final, permanent, happy outcome for these children. Case closed. And for many
kids, it is a day to celebrate.
Yet, for other kids, our
celebration might not match their reality. Adoption reflects a tremendous loss
in their lives. Children may never again see their birth parents, siblings and relatives.
They might lose their friends, communities and schools. They might be stripped
of their racial and cultural identity. Even their birth certificates and names might
be changed.
During my coffee, one thought kept
entering my mind. As a system, do we do enough to hear the voices of these
children, either before or after they are cut off from their families? Have we learned how these children experience
the termination of their parent’s rights?
At what point do we even inquire whether these kids would prefer to
continue having a relationship with their birth families, even if their parents
can’t care for them?
We could force systems to do this. For
example, we could require a court to consider a child’s opinion about the
termination of their parent’s rights before a final decision is made. We could
mandate that children have a client-directed lawyer in every one of those proceedings.
We could pass laws that instruct courts to consider less drastic alternatives,
such as a guardianship or custody agreement, prior to taking the severe step of
terminating parental rights. We could incentivize states to offer subsidies for
other less drastic forms of permanency at the same level as adoption subsidies.
These suggestions all revolve
around a basic point – that before courts take the dramatic step of permanently
ending a child’s relationship with their birth family, they should ensure that
the decision makes sense for the specific child before them. At a minimum, this
must include hearing the child’s voice, and considering other alternatives that
might give the child a permanent home while also preserving important
relationships.
And if we do need to terminate
parental rights, kids deserve the opportunity to have someone carefully explain
to them why it was absolutely necessary to take this step, why no other options
existed, and what rights they might have to reconnect with their families if
they choose to do so.
To those of you adopted out of the
foster care system, share your voices. Tell us what worked and what didn’t. Let
us listen and learn from you. Let your experiences and wisdom guide the
creation of a new foster care system that prioritizes preserving and strengthening
meaningful relationships over expediency and efficiency.
Comments
Post a Comment